For Safer Diagnostics haloperidol for nausea Trust Not the FDA

It is hard to trust the U.S. Food and drug administration (FDA) for that could end with you or a loved one’s death. The FDA seems to have everything backwards. They endorse what is dangerous and send SWATT teams out haloperidol for nausea to organizations that sell or practice safer medicine. The FDA, and the people who willingly work for it, are responsible for the deaths of countless men, women and children for the medical system it promotes and haloperidol for nausea protects kills hundreds of thousands of americans each year.

It is bad enough that they endorse pharmaceutical drugs that haloperidol for nausea all have side effects because they are, in reality, chemical poisons given at low dosages. But to use death rays, nuclear radiation at almost lethal dose to treat cancer and haloperidol for nausea intense x-rays in CT and PET scans that cause cancer to haloperidol for nausea diagnose disease, instead of using safer forms of radiation, is really too much.

A recent study at one new york hospital found that haloperidol for nausea nearly a third of its patients undergoing multiple cardiac imaging haloperidol for nausea tests were getting a cumulative effective dose of more than haloperidol for nausea 100 millisieverts of radiation — equivalent to 5,000 chest X-rays, with FDA approval. The radiation doses of CT scans (a series of X-ray images from multiple angles) are 100 to 1,000 times higher than conventional X-rays. Again, with FDA approval. Scientific american confirms these high readings, “A single CT scan subjects the human body to between haloperidol for nausea 150 and 1,100 times the radiation of a conventional x-ray.

Researchers at the national cancer institute estimate that 29,000 future cancer cases could be attributed to the 72 haloperidol for nausea million CT scans performed in the country in 2007. FDA approved tests are killing 15 to 20 thousand people haloperidol for nausea a year from cancer.” in 1980, there were 3 million CT scans done. By the year 2007, the number increased to about 70 million.

Currently it is estimated that at least 80 million CT haloperidol for nausea scans are done each year. In ten years that adds up to 800 million scans haloperidol for nausea enough to irradiate the entire american population almost three times. In twenty years it would be six times. Anyone saying this is safe or the benefits outweigh the haloperidol for nausea harm should see a psychiatrist. Sometimes the equipment, like all machines malfunctions, and emits much higher doses of radiation.

“I’m a 28yo male and I had a head CT haloperidol for nausea scan on the 20th feb. A couple of days after the scan I had hair haloperidol for nausea loss within my eyebrows, really bad toilets, waking up in pain with the abdomen. My forehead felt as though it had been sunburned and haloperidol for nausea had earache and some tinnitus. I then began to feel really dizzy and have been haloperidol for nausea since. As if something is pulling me to the right. My eyes had a flare up, really badly bloodshot and the feeling they were going cross haloperidol for nausea eyed. I’ve been having flashes of blue and white and having haloperidol for nausea a really hard time focusing and concentrating.”

“I’ve been to my GP and hospital, and they both say that this isn’t possible and that I must have anxiety. I know what anxiety is, and yes, I’m anxious right now, but my anxiety is based on physical things happening to haloperidol for nausea my body and not just the idea of it. They’ve not ran any tests, and simply said it’s not possible, as though a machine can never malfunction!”

The food and drug administration reports that an estimated 30 haloperidol for nausea to 50 percent of imaging tests are believed to be haloperidol for nausea medically unnecessary. Radiation exposure is cumulative, and children, who undergo between 5 million and 9 million CT scans haloperidol for nausea annually, are much more vulnerable to its effects.

Studies performed in the united kingdom in 2012 and in haloperidol for nausea australia in 2013 found an increase in cases of leukemia haloperidol for nausea and malignant brain tumors among children and young adults who haloperidol for nausea had undergone CT scans. One concern, said hernanz-schulman, a past president of the society for pediatric radiology, is that many children undergo CT scans in adult facilities haloperidol for nausea and may receive excessive doses because scanners are not adjusted haloperidol for nausea between patients.

Meanwhile, to demonstrate that the FDA cannot stand safe medicine, in february of 2019 it issued a warning letter to haloperidol for nausea total thermal imaging inc., of la mesa, calif., and its president and co-owner, linda hayes, for illegally marketing and distributing an unapproved thermography device as haloperidol for nausea a sole screening device for breast cancer and other diseases. The FDA would prefer woman use cancer causing tests like haloperidol for nausea mammograms.

Thermography is a noninvasive tool that uses an infrared camera haloperidol for nausea to produce images that show the patterns of heat and haloperidol for nausea blood flow on or near the surface of the body. Thermography devices, also known as digital infrared imaging devices, have been cleared by the FDA only as an adjunct haloperidol for nausea tool, meaning it should only be use alongside a primary diagnostic haloperidol for nausea test like mammography, not as a standalone screening or diagnostic tool.

The use of infrared digital imaging is based on the haloperidol for nausea principle that metabolic activity and vascular circulation in precancerous tissues haloperidol for nausea and areas surrounding developing cancer are almost always higher than haloperidol for nausea in normal tissues. T he results of the thermography can be correct 8–10 years before a mammogram can detect a mass in haloperidol for nausea the body of the patient. [1]

The FDA is afraid proponents of digital imaging will mislead haloperidol for nausea patients into believing that thermography is an alternative or better haloperidol for nausea option than mammography. It is a better option than mammography, which use cancer provoking radiation that with each exposure increases haloperidol for nausea the chances a woman will get breast cancer.

They of course have their rationalizations. Their dangerous tests are worth the trouble in their eyes. The benefits out-way the risks they say. But with the american public’s health down the toilet what are the benefits of haloperidol for nausea the FDA led medical system?

The most important indicator of a potential health problem is haloperidol for nausea inflammation. Thermography can detect inflammation, often long before you feel any symptoms. Digital thermography provides patients with an opportunity for early intervention haloperidol for nausea for many illnesses. Since cancer is an inflammation, and since inflammation is the backbone or common denominator of haloperidol for nausea most diseases, thermal imaging can be used to great effect in the haloperidol for nausea avoidance of and early treatment of disease.

“inflammatory responses play decisive roles at different stages of tumor haloperidol for nausea development, including initiation, promotion, malignant conversion, invasion, and metastasis. Inflammation also affects immune surveillance and responses to therapy. Immune cells that infiltrate tumors engage in an extensive and haloperidol for nausea dynamic crosstalk with cancer cells,” say researchers from departments of pharmacology and pathology, school of medicine, university of california in san diego.

People are famous for waiting until symptoms get so bad haloperidol for nausea they finally act on them. At that point, there is probably little room for prevention leaving them with haloperidol for nausea little choice if they are working with doctors but have haloperidol for nausea to endure invasive testing, drugs with side effects, plus treatments and surgeries that may greatly reduce quality of haloperidol for nausea life.

Natural allopathic medicine however offers a different set of options haloperidol for nausea that support your body’s ability to heal itself through various modalities like diet haloperidol for nausea changes, concentrated natural medicines used in ICU departments, and many other medical processes like acupuncture, chiropractic, massage, exercise all of which are designed to aid our bodies haloperidol for nausea in returning to a healthy state of well being.

There are many safe natural ways of testing our selves haloperidol for nausea and our loved ones to detect problems early on when haloperidol for nausea they are easy to treat. Heart rate variability (HRV) is one diagnostic method that looks at changes in our haloperidol for nausea heart beats, which is the best measurement of stress. Being aware of ones hydration through awareness of our urine haloperidol for nausea and its color is another. Using ph paper to measure acidity and staying aware of haloperidol for nausea our rate of breathing can all tune us into health haloperidol for nausea dynamics.

If one likes part of the mainstream medical model, but would prefer it be practiced in a safer way, than perhaps every family member should have a full body haloperidol for nausea thermal scan once a year in order to discover and haloperidol for nausea prevent disease and illness. Certainly a breast scan once a year would be much haloperidol for nausea safer than a yearly mammogram.

Unlike PSA and the palpation test, thermal imaging examines the physiological environment affecting the prostate that haloperidol for nausea may lead to or indicate cancer, including intestinal, kidney, and lymph conditions. Understanding the physiological environment may lead to treatments or behavioral haloperidol for nausea changes that deter the cancer from forming.